In a recent interview on CNBC, the Chairman of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Gary Gensler, refrained from definitively categorizing Ethereum as a commodity or security. Instead, Gensler emphasized the importance of safeguarding American investors and addressed the behavior of intermediaries in the cryptocurrency space.
When questioned by Andrew Ross Sorkin on the “Squawk Box” program, Gensler stated, “What I can say is that my central concern is: how can we protect the American investor? Currently, they are not receiving the information that is properly required.”
Gensler went on to criticize the existing structure of the cryptocurrency market, drawing comparisons to practices that are prohibited in more traditional markets. He stated, “And the intermediaries, who are at the heart of this centralized market, often operate in conflict, doing things that we would never allow the New York Stock Exchange to do, like trading against the investors.”
The legal status of Ethereum is a significant area of interest, as its classification could determine the regulations governing its future and its potential inclusion in exchange-traded funds (ETFs). However, Gensler did not confirm this classification during the interview.
Gensler did mention that the SEC is currently reviewing several Ethereum-based ETF filings. He used this opportunity to shift the focus from specific findings to the broader goals of the SEC, emphasizing that investor protection is their top priority.
While the SEC’s stance on Ethereum was not explicitly revealed, their actions suggest a move towards classifying Ether as a security. Ongoing investigations into the Ethereum Foundation and the existence of court documents pointing in that direction support this notion.
Gensler stated that the SEC’s attention to cryptocurrencies is largely driven by media coverage and public interest, rather than being a reflection of their own regulatory agenda. He explained, “The focus on cryptocurrencies is more a response to public interest and media coverage than a reflection of our regulatory agenda.”
Furthermore, Gensler highlighted that many tokens still fail to comply with necessary regulations, resulting in a lack of transparency and adequate investor protection.
In conclusion, Gensler avoided delving into the oversight of other market players, such as Robinhood, which has faced threats of legal action from the SEC. He reiterated that the commission’s primary objective is to ensure investor protection and compliance with securities trading laws.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. Investing or trading cryptocurrencies carries a risk of financial loss.
Editor’s Choice: Pro-XRP Legal Experts Predict Ripple Defeat in Latest Action. Michael Saylor Warns About SEC Classification of Cryptos as Securities.